Entropy Regularisation is a widely adopted technique that enhances policy optimisation performance and stability. A notable form of entropy regularisation is augmenting the objective with an entropy term, thereby simultaneously optimising the expected return and the entropy. This framework, known as maximum entropy reinforcement learning (MaxEnt RL), has shown theoretical and empirical successes. However, its practical application in straightforward on-policy actor-critic settings remains surprisingly underexplored. We hypothesise that this is due to the difficulty of managing the entropy reward in practice. This paper proposes a simple method of separating the entropy objective from the MaxEnt RL objective, which facilitates the implementation of MaxEnt RL in on-policy settings. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate that extending Proximal Policy Optimisation (PPO) and Trust Region Policy Optimisation (TRPO) within the MaxEnt framework improves policy optimisation performance in both MuJoCo and Procgen tasks. Additionally, our results highlight MaxEnt RL's capacity to enhance generalisation.

Maximum entropy (MaxEnt) RL maximizes a combination of the original task reward and an entropy reward. It is believed that the regularization imposed by entropy, on both policy improvement and policy evaluation, together contributes to good exploration, training convergence, and robustness of learned policies. This paper takes a closer look at entropy as an intrinsic reward, by conducting various ablation studies on soft actor-critic (SAC), a popular representative of MaxEnt RL. Our findings reveal that in general, entropy rewards should be applied with caution to policy evaluation. On one hand, the entropy reward, like any other intrinsic reward, could obscure the main task reward if it is not properly managed. We identify some failure cases of the entropy reward especially in episodic Markov decision processes (MDPs), where it could cause the policy to be overly optimistic or pessimistic. On the other hand, our large-scale empirical study shows that using entropy regularization alone in policy improvement, leads to comparable or even better performance and robustness than using it in both policy improvement and policy evaluation. Based on these observations, we recommend either normalizing the entropy reward to a zero mean (SACZero), or simply removing it from policy evaluation (SACLite) for better practical results.